The People News, a free newspaper serving Cleveland Tennessee (TN) and Bradley County Tennessee (Tn).





Of Bradley County Tn.


DECEMBER  2007

                            The People News, a free newspaper serving Cleveland and Bradley County Tn.

HOME

BACK ISSUE ARCHIVE

EDITORIALS

LETTERS

CONTACT US

What Do You Think?
by pete edwards

Editorial for THE PEOPLE

The spectacle is over.

Recent happenings in the Bradley County court system have returned to me a measure of confidence that has been woefully lacking for several years. In the past, I have witnessed evidence being lost and key witnesses "moving out of state" in high profile cases. Offers to "fix" a case from within the system and scandals with Grand Jury management. Courtroom etiquette had eroded to such a point as to make a mockery of  the local legal system. It was all in all a sad reflection of the rule of law in Cleveland and Bradley County.

The Gobble v. Bradley County case went a long way to improve my trust in court integrity.

I must admit I had completely misjudged the character of Circuit Court Judge, John Hagler, who presided over the case. When the case was first publicized I thought, "here we go again, more waffling to give credence to a done deal at the expense of the taxpayer." I had seen such occurrences so often before that I have become cynical.

This time it surprised me, the whole process was respectful to everyone involved and to the system itself,  and the judgement was guided by law, not prejudice.

You are probably thinking that I am saying that Hagler's ruling was fair because I wanted Gobble's case to fail and that I am the prejudiced one - and you would be absolutely correct. But prejudiced not because I begrudge the extra funding Gobble says he needs but because he really doesn't need it. There are two reasons why I don't believe his demands where justified.

First, personnel - I researched staffing at the new justice center several years ago and discovered the criteria for calculation of the number of jail staff necessary to run the facility was flawed, and the numbers had been grossly inflated, even by Tennessee Corrections Institute standards.  Those inflated numbers are still being used to justify staffing levels. Also, there was no difficulty filling the extra positions that had become available, one person even asked if I could put in a good word for them to be considered for hire. And, there was still enough staff  last month for the Sheriff to take on extra prisoners when the Polk County Jail was decertified and closed down (that is a story for another day.)

Second, vehicles - although the department is using high mileage patrol cars that should be discarded, this paper's research shows that the department is top heavy with

Pete Edwards
Editor - Publisher

More Editorials

unnecessary vehicles in order to supply a take home car to staff. Incidentally, it is my belief that to achieve good management practices and improve efficiency, the allocation of vehicles should be revisited and the fleet downsized to essential vehicles only, but  I digress.

Hagler's court proved the system can still function as it should but Gobble's loss in no way reflects badly on his legal team. They did a heroic job of presenting a case that had no merit to start with. It seems Bradley County Mayor, D. Gary Davis, was placed in a position to defend the county that was not of his making and, apart from the inappropriate Gobble money eating bank episode, conducted himself with dignity. His legal team of local attorneys Robert Thompson and James Logan, appeared to be outclassed by their out of town opponents and they may not have found the case so easy to win without the impressive expert witness support. But they did win for the county taxpayer so they should be congratulated.

What did we learn from this experience? I learned that even in the scoundrel infested town of Cleveland, it is still possible to be impressed by the wisdom of the occasional genuine leader. Judge Hagler won the bout while wrestling with important conflicting interests. It must have been difficult for him to find against those he calls friends. That takes real courage.

The moral of the story is, just as with our children, who we cherish, they understand that it is not that we don't care when we deny them something - in the real world, it is not possible to have everything, priorities must be set and disappointment is a part of the learning, growing up experience.

This learning, growing up experience just cost the taxpayer a fortune in legal expenses, I hope the lesson was worth it.

That's what I think. What do you think?


Smile, please

I am an English-American.... Not really, I am an American citizen who happens to have been born in England but I just wanted to see how silly it looks when it appears in print.

While I am on the subject of England, those Americans who support the use of surveillance cameras to identify people who jump red lights or speed or to provide other law enforcement duties, should take a look how privacy has been eroded to the point of nonexistence in the birthplace of freedom, the United Kingdom, as it is now known. There are cameras almost everywhere that is public and many places that are private. Although policing has become easier and impersonal and court coffers are bulging with video enforced fines, there are just as many speeders, light jumpers and the country is just as violent and unruly as it has always been, maybe even more so. There are more office dwelling police officers watching a monitor and less on the streets to protect you form burglars or muggers. The surveillance cameras do sometimes catch a criminal in the act but they do not prevent crime, only witness it. The ordinary, usually law abiding person, is easy prey for the all seeing lens but the real criminal sees them as a minor inconvenience. This must be true because crime would have been eliminated long ago if the crime fighting prowess of video was justified. The only proven method of preventing crime is a human being, on the spot, preferably with a big gun.

America affords its citizens the most personal freedom and privacy of any country on earth, yet its crime rate is better than most. Immigrants like myself flock to its shores to taste that which is so scarce elsewhere. There are those in America, as there are in England, that place little value on other people's freedom. Be wary of sharp sales talk intent on persuading you to relinquish that which makes America unique, for some promised but elusive safety. History has shown that once a freedom is lost it can never be regained. It is common knowledge that liberty is lost, not in one fell swoop, but is eroded one freedom at a time. It seems few Americans are paying attention.

That's what I think. What do you think?

.

More Editorials

More Editorials

HOME

BACK ISSUE ARCHIVE

EDITORIALS

LETTERS

CONTACT US