The one part of Grimsley's story that confuses me is when he mentioned "boatloads" of players who participated in the use of banned substances.  When someone says "boatloads", I don't exactly think of my dad's bass boat.  It brings to mind something similar to The Love Boat.  I know I was quite young when the series was on the tube but to the best of my knowledge, the boat carried many more than "nearly a dozen players".  Either Grimsley had a poor choice of words or someone is keeping a great number of names hush-hush.

In April Grimsley admitted to using banned substances throughout his career, yet we had no knowledge of this until June.  Does that mean admitted banned substance users have a two-month grace period?

Didn't Rafael Palmeiro test positive for steroids a good while before it became public?  Is there a smoking gun somewhere that is not visible to the public?

In one way baseball looks like the good son who messed up badly over the

years and is drastically making efforts to clean up the mess left behind.  The other way to see this is there may be enough damning testimony in the near future to rock the foundation of baseball.  What if Grimsley named more names than we know about?  How many people that he called out will decide to name names as well?

Ah… the American Pastime, shrouded in controversy.  Eventually, this ever-growing saga will make the mid-1980's cocaine ring look like a sleigh ride on Christmas Eve.  But what will happen to the record book?

Will Cooperstown have a split section for all-time records?  Legitimate Top 10 home run hitters to the left, juiced-up Top 10

home run hitters to the right?  Will pitchers who started their careers after 1990 get a half-run knocked off of their career earned run average (ERA) before consideration for enshrinement?

Yes this is a very over the top suggestion but it is one that needs considering.  Baseball has entrenched itself into the